Eternity and Effervescence

In order for there to be something, there must have always been something, even if that something seems to be a relative nothing. That means that there must be some sort of existence that is eternal, be it god/God, or just an eternal reality. In order for this entity/reality to be eternal, it must possess two qualities: omnipresent and omnipotent. These two qualities can only be possessed by one thing, and something can't have one if it doesn't have the other (something is not omnipotent if does not emcompass every aspect of existence, because then it has boundaries, or limitations). These qualities can only be possessed by one thing because two different things cannot be omnipotent because invariably one would have to be weaker than the other. This eternal presence would possess both qualities, and would have an existence that defies the rules of existence in our reality, because it has no point of beginning and no point of end (which everything in our universe has).

The only real conflict with the omnipresence is our own reality, which has differences and deviations that are clearly not eternal. The thing is, because eternity would have to be omnipresent, it could very well create an effervescent reality made up of its own fiber, but in order for this reality to be different from the eternal existence, its eternality had to be sacrificed. As such, all things are not eternity are effervescent. This does not mean that they cease to exist at any point, it just means that their effervescent existence will change and they will revert back to the substance eternity. The law of conservation energy states that nothing is ever truly lost. With this in mind, it is obvious that everything just changes then. Our reality is effervescent, but it will still always exist in some form or another, even if that form is the substance of eternity.

I will talk often of eternity and effervescence, as they are crucial themes for me when trying to understand the many aspects of reality and our minds. With that in mind, I'll talk about more later.